Re-use and publishing of digital teaching and learning materials
FAQ auf Deutsch ansehen.
Even if the
works are found freely online, they are generally copyright protected and
cannot be used without further ado. A label like the © symbol or a text note
such as “All rights reserved” is not needed to indicate that the content is
protected.
Art. 19 URG defines exceptions that allow the use of protected works, which are:
Thus, restrictions must be observed, especially upon publishing the materials, for example:
In case of a broader audience, only use:
Under CopA Art. 2(1), material is deemed to be protected if it:
Pursuant to CopA Art. 2(2), such materials thus include written works, musical
pieces, images, plans and maps as well as photographic and cinematographic
works. Materials that are not considered protected works in a legal sense and
are thus not copyright protected include:
If a work that
you would like to use is not covered by an
open licence (e.g. a Creative Commons licence), ask the author (or the rights holder) for
their consent where appropriate. When doing so, go into as much detail as
possible about the planned use.
To ensure you can prove the issuing of consent, you should permanently archive
the relevant correspondence. If you do not receive consent, you can look for an
alternative that is available under an open licence.
See also: Where can I find openly licensed
materials?
Under the Swiss
Copyright Act, images, films and audio material may be cited in the same
way as written texts. However, the right of quotation (CopA Art. 25) requires
that the content of the material is dealt with in depth.
The © symbol is
an international symbol that is used in connection with copyright protected
works. It indicates a work’s copyright holder.
However, there is no requirement to use the © symbol. Copyright applies to a
work as soon as it is created. Registration or other formalities, such as the
use of the © symbol or “All rights reserved”, are not required.
All works that can be freely found online and that are not covered under an open licence,
such as a Creative Commons licence, are therefore copyright protected.
Under CopA Art. 29(2), a work’s copyright protection expires 70 years after the death of the author. In the case of software, this period is 50 years.
Works for which
copyright has expired (in Switzerland, 70 years after the death of the author
or final copyright holder), are deemed to be in the public domain (see CopA Art. 29).
You are permitted to use, change and distribute these works even if no licence
or public domain mark is attached.
Copyright is divided into moral rights and rights of use.
If you would like to use your teaching materials in another context outside of your teaching activities at the ZHAW, you have two options:
Take the warning
seriously – provided it relates to a work that you have actually used. However,
do not sign any cease-and-desist declarations, pay a contractual penalty or
agree to a settlement without further ado. Firstly, check whether the
accusation of a copyright infringement is actually justified.
If possible, remove the content in question from the network and seek
legal advice if you can.
In connection with works that are created as part of your employment
relationship at the ZHAW, it is best to consult the ZHAW
Legal Service (intranet page available in German only).
Find more information in the FAQs of
CCdigitallaw.ch (Question 2.2.8-1).
In the Colourbox and Adobe Stock image databases, you will find professional photos that you may use in connection with your work at the ZHAW.
For Colourbox, this applies only to internal purposes. The use for commercial purposes (brochures, external flyers, etc.) or public distribution of course material or presentations is not permitted.
s. Instructions and information about Colourbox and Adobe Stock on the intranet (in German only).
Please note: If you want to publish your material under a Creative Commons license as OER - Open Educational Resources, you cannot use images from Adobe Stock or Colourbox. Images from Adobe Stock and Colourbox may not be released for redistribution by third parties.
Many image
databases with free images publish their materials under their own licence
(e.g. Pixabay, Unsplash, or Pexels).
Even if the licenses of these image databases, like CC0-licensed images, do not require attribution / naming of the authors, it is still advisable to indicate the origin and link to the original.
According to CopA Art. 2, Swiss copyright law protects only intellectual creations (by persons). Content generated solely by AI is not protected by copyright. However, the material may have some overlap with existing copyright protected materials with which the AI tool has been trained. Also, the tools' terms and conditions may state that the content may not be shared publicly.
Only the work is protected by copyright, not the idea. You may therefore make your own images that are inspired by other works.
It is important though, that your work is not a pure copy, i.e. that the original is not directly recognizable in the new work. Better put away the original and create the model or image anew from your own imagination and use your creativity.
Where there is little room for originality (for example, in an anatomical drawing), it is quicker to assume that you have moved sufficiently far from the original image. However, anything like just changing the color is usually not enough.
In a scientific context, it is necessary to name the original source, e.g.: Own work based on XY (year) and the full details of the source in the reference list.
It is also possible to cite images, provided that they serve to illustrate and explain your own statement (see above). In this case, you would not have to reproduce the image, but could use the original image directly.Steinhau from irights.info writes in his blog post "Die Verwendung von Marken in (freien) Bildungsmedien", (German) that logos and brands underly the trademark law, and are usually not under copyright protection. Logos may be depicted (even in openly licensed material) if you don't give the impression that the trademark owners issued or initiated the material.
Add a disclaimer when using logos or depicting trademarks, as indicated in the Information sheet on CC licences and publishing open educational resources (OER) at the ZHAW. This also applies to the use of the trademark and logo of ZHAW.
Source: Steinhau, Henry (2019). Die Verwendung von Marken in (freien) Bildungsmedien, retrievved on April 28, 2023, under CC BY 4.0.
Usually, you would quote data, tables, graphs or diagrams by discussing them in your work and referring to them directly. This is allowed according to the citation law (see above).
If you do not cite, the following applies:
Good to know: Data, too, can be published under open licenses such as the Creative Commons - or in publications that are under such a license. Check this and use the data in accordance with the license.
Websites are protected by copyright if they have a certain level of individuality, e.g. if special creative elements such as images and designs are used. In that case, it is not allowed to publish a copy of the website / a screenshot.
However, Steinhau (2020) states that user interfaces of operating systems and apps contain many design elements, such as navigation bars, icons, pictograms, emoticons, etc. According to Steinhau (2020) small-scale graphic designs and pictographic elements of user interfaces are usually not subject to copyright protection. That means screenshots of such user interfaces, along with their icons, navigation, and functional elements, can be used for publication.
When in doubt:
In the case of map providers such as Google Maps, it is argued that the necessary degree of originality is achieved through the elaborate processing - and thus online maps are usually copyright-protected.
An alternative to commercial portals is Open Street Map, which is offered under an Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0 (retrieved 4/28/2023).
For mere outlines of a country or continent, it can be assumed that there is no level of originality and that these are not protected by copyright.
With
satellite images, the decisive factor is whether they are triggered
automatically by the device (not protected by copyright, since it is not the
work of a human being) or whether a human being controls and triggers the
recording (then it would be protected, analog to any photograph). In general,
this cannot be recognized from the images.
However, NASA and other publicly funded
institutions make some of their materials available for public distribution and
use (see: NASA Media Usage Guidelines).